Thursday, November 23, 2017

Our Internet Access is Under Attack



Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)


Our Internet Access is Under Attack


By Marco Ayllon
Nautilus Science and Technology News
November 23, 2017


Who owns, or has influence over, the internet providers? They could have too much influence over what sites and information we have access to. We wouldn't think of not having freedom of the press. Freedom of the Internet should not be limited by bias of Internet providers. This is as important as a free press.

I read on the news the other day about people in our cities have no clue of what is "net neutrality," and the meaning. Had it been called "Free and Open Internet" that was under attack, then people would care and would be contacting their representatives demanding that the internet be left as is without interference.

One of the best arguments I saw is the simple example of everyone, It does not matter who you are, and what you have experienced; we are supposed to trust the companies who can't show up between 10 and 2 with the future of the internet our tax dollars paid to “create”? Those companies who claim a 4G phone connection (that never seems to happen), are going to be in charge. For us as consumers, interference and Internet regulations by those big Internet providers is a serious issue, but we smell a diversion from the tax cut legislation. Both are an attack on us all, we must find common ground to resist the selling of our country for their gain.

I think, Free Internet will allow us a free democratic digital society. With Internet under olies (oligarchy) control and regulations of the Internet access will affect our freedom of information, freedom of money, freedom of delivery, and freedom of choice. Anyone with this much power will only concentrate more power and not decentralize. Don't forget freedom of assembly when people use social media to meet virtually, instead of personally.

Now days’ we pay for the use of the Internet the same as another utility service. Like water and electricity there should be fair access to the Internet and access to it and pricing for service should be regulated. Any attempt to categorize it as anything other than a commodity it would be as an attempt to gouge consumers on price and create an unequal access to businesses and data that is slanted to benefit only the largest corporations. 

Network Neutrality is the foundation of free speech and a fair playing field for all sizes of businesses and consumers alike. Don't sit by idle and let net neutrality be repealed, you should take an action to try and stop this nonsense Internet service control! Write a letter to Congress, join a demonstration, or talk to others about this.

Equal access to online information is once again under serious threat. John Oliver encourages internet commenters to voice their displeasure to the FCC by visiting www.gofccyourself.com  and clicking "express" to file your comment.

You can go direct to this FCC link and click Express yourself.

Another Related Video related: The Internet is Under Attack

https://www.facebook.com/senatorsanders/videos/10156519158637908/



Steps to write your comments to voice your displeasure to the FCC by visiting www.gofccyourself.com  and clicking "express" to file your comment.









Saturday, November 18, 2017

Firefox Quantum is Super-Fast than Other Browsers



Firefox Quantum is Super-Fast than Other Browsers
While the User Surfs the Web, Conserves Memory


By Marco Ayllon
Nautilus Science and Technology News

The Firefox Frontier Everything you need to know to browse fast.

The Speedometer 2.0 benchmark simulates modern web applications and is a relatively simple way of evaluating a browser’s speed. We have run a few tests to compare Firefox Quantum (57)’s speed and memory as compared to previous versions of Firefox, and to Chrome. Results vary based on your computer and the apps you’re using, but Firefox Quantum is consistently about 2X faster than Firefox was.


Test 1:
Conducted on September 19, 2017 using Surface Laptop (Processor: Intel Core i7 / Memory: 8GB / Storage: 256 GB ), a new Firefox profile, and no other apps or tabs running.

Test       Firefox 52            Firefox Quantum (57) Beta
Test 1    35           67
Test 2    35           68
Test 3    35           67
Test Average      35           67
Firefox Quantum (57.0 b1 64-bit)
Firefox 52 (52.0 64-bit)

Test 2
Conducted on September 20, 2017 using MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2016) (2.9GHz Intel Core i7 / 16GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3 / 1TB PCIe SSD), a new Firefox profile, and no other apps or tabs running.

Test       Firefox 52            Firefox Quantum (57) Beta
Test 1    33           67
Test 2    32           65
Test 3    31           65
Test Average      32           66
Firefox Quantum (57.0 b1 64-bit)
Firefox 52 (52.0 64-bit)

In addition to speed testing, Firefox’s “just right” multi-process architecture results in Firefox Quantum consuming roughly 30% less RAM than Chrome.


To compare memory usage, the Atsy project was used to load 30 pages, each in its own tab, with 10 seconds in between loads and 60 seconds of settle time at the end. Then memory usage was measured for the various processes that each browser spawns during that time.




Children's Smartwatches Are Banned in Germany





Children's Smartwatches Are Banned in Germany

By Marco Ayllon
Nautilus Science and Technology News

A sale of smartwatches aimed at children has banned by a German government agency, and found out on such devices unsafe snooping and spaying software.
It had previously banned an internet-connected doll called My Friend Cayla, for similar reasons. The German Telecoms regulator the Federal Network Agency urged parents who had such watches to destroy them. One expert said the decision could be a "game-changer" for internet-connected devices.

"Unwell secured smart devices often allow for privacy invasion. That is really concerning when it comes to kids' GPS tracking watches - the very watches that are supposed to help keep them safe," said Ken Munro, a security expert at Pen Test Partners. "There is a shocking lack of regulation of the 'internet of things', which allows lax manufacturers to sell us dangerously insecure smart products.

"Using privacy regulation to ban such devices is a game-changer, stopping these manufacturers playing fast and loose with our kids' security," he added. In a statement, the agency said it had already taken action against several firms offering such watches on the internet.

"Using an app, parents can use such children's watches to listen unnoticed to the child's environment and they are to be regarded as an unauthorized transmitting system," said Jochen Homann, president of the Federal Network Agency. "According to our research, parents' watches are also used to listen to teachers in the classroom." The agency also asked schools to "pay more attention" to such watches among students.

Stalking and Chasing Children
Such watches - which are sold by many providers in Germany - are generally aimed at children between the ages of five and 12. The majority of this devices are equipped with a Sim card and a limited telephony function and are set up and controlled via an app. The last month, the Norwegian Consumer Council (NCC) reported that 'some children's watches - including Gator and GPS for kids - had flaws such as transmitting and storing data without encryption.

It meant that strangers, using basic hacking techniques, could track children as they moved or make a child appear to be in a completely different location. It is not clear whether the German decision to ban such devices was based on the privacy issues associated with them or wider security flaws that have been uncovered by NCC and others. Both firms said that they had resolved the security issues.


Mr. Finn Myrstad, head of digital policy at the NCC said: "This ban sends a strong signal to makers of products aimed at children that they need to be safer." He called for Europe-wide procedure actions to intensify the security of such devices.